BLOG ITALIA
Friday September 27 2013
The fall and fall of Marco Giampaolo

Once a contender for the Juventus job and compared with Fabio Capello, Marco Giampaolo’s coaching career has taken a nosedive. Antonio Labbate writes.

In September 2009, Fabio Capello was asked 100 questions by Marie Claire magazine. The 34th read: Which Coach is the new Capello? “One of the most interesting around is Siena boss Marco Giampaolo,” answered the then England manager.

As responses go, that was an eyebrow raiser but confirmation of the belief that the 42-year-old had notable touchline potential. Nevertheless, at the time, he was only in the middle of his third coaching stint after success with Ascoli but failure at Cagliari.

Amongst those who were surprised by Don Fabio’s answer was the man himself. “Capello’s words were unexpected, but a great honour,” Giampaolo stated. “To tell you the truth, I don’t really understand why he mentioned me. I feel light years away from what he has achieved and what he continues to achieve.

“It is hard to express my gratitude to Capello. His career would be a dream for all Coaches, even if that is realistically utopia. To win over time in so many different realities as he has done requires great leadership, strength and charisma.”

Less than two months later and Giampaolo was out of work, sacked by Siena after picking up just five points from the first 10 games of the season. It was a massive personal setback for two reasons. The first is that he had masterminded the club’s survival the previous term with a record points haul. The second is that he was considered for the Juventus job during the summer of 2009.

The Turin giants had a decision to make. After sacking Claudio Ranieri with two games to go of the 2008-09 campaign, the Old Lady were considering their options. Amongst them was the Swiss-born Coach who had an agreement with Siena chief Giovanni Lombardi Stronati that he would be released if a big club came knocking.

“I would have been allowed to leave for an offer of a lifetime,” Giampaolo admitted after the Old Lady had decided to keep Ciro Ferrara in charge. “That duly arrived, but it could not be finalised. I had always said that I would not leave Siena for a side of equal standing.”

While Giampaolo didn’t name the Bianconeri, Stronati was keen to reveal all. “I can confirm that the Mister was being followed by Juve. I gave him permission to talk to them as it would have been a proud moment for us had he gone to Turin.”

Despite his axing in Tuscany, much was still expected following his move to Catania in the summer of 2010. That’s because there were times when his Ascoli side, as well as his early Cagliari and Siena creations, played some great stuff. But his penchant for possession football did sometimes lead to sterile play with no end product.

In January 2011, he was shown the door in Sicily but was handed another chance in Serie A with Cesena. What followed was a disastrous run of results which accumulated just three points in nine games. The axe was inevitable and it duly arrived in October 2011.

Giampaolo was given some time to ponder on his failures. Top-flight clubs stopped calling and it wasn’t until an offer from Brescia this summer that he was handed a return to the game. President Gino Corioni decided to give him an opportunity and raised expectations of success when comparing him to former Brescia boss Mircea Lucescu, who is now in charge of Champions League outfit Shakhtar Donetsk.

That association may have been a slight exaggeration, a claim to appease the fans who thought former Coach Alessandro Calori should have been retained at the Rigamonti. Giampaolo’s three draws from their opening three Serie B games did nothing to fuel enthusiasm, while the statistic that Brescia’s win at Ternana in Week 4 was his first victory for over 1000 days added to the negativity. “But how many games have I bossed in that time?” retorted the tactician.

The more pertinent question would have been how many more games would he take charge of while at Brescia. The answer to that was one. Following the 2-1 home loss to Crotone, Giampaolo, in the interests of public safety, was asked by the authorities to talk with members of the club’s Ultras.

The 46-year-old subsequently offered his resignation, a request which the club turned down. But Giampaolo’s mind was made up as he went AWOL. He failed to show up for training on Sunday or Monday, he initially turned off his phone and then refused to pick up after turning it back on. He resurfaced on Wednesday to rescind his contract, putting pen to paper on more evidence that potential is useless unless it is realised.

Think you know your Italian football? Share your knowledge, tips and comments to win cash prizes in OLBG's tipster competition - £5,000 monthly.

Have your say...
NIC...seriously..it has to do with a huge falling out with Corioni and Iaconi. He was frustrated at the start because of the lack of movement in the transfer window which was promised him. Then he was questioned by fans and the head office on every move and had enough. The exact moment in that closed door meeting..you are right..nobody knows but them. But as for the ultras...it was 7 who went to demand a sit downwith him. 7! The media loves the 'ultra' story but it wasn't the catalyst.
on the 1st October, 2013 at 12:36am
oh come on now BRESCIA1911?! there has to be something more to it then that. impossible that a manager (professional) like giampaolo would abruptly just STOP going back to work. i don't believe that for one second. something happened here with someone. the question is; what happened? does anyone know? someone, including giampaolo must reveal it. many people have some real explaining to do.
on the 30th September, 2013 at 4:29pm
I do agree with NIC that the ultras in Italy have a lot of power but it is what it is. At the beginning of the season Corioni promised Giampaolo many things that he felt were not being delivered so he walked. I think Giampaolo was completely wrong for the team as Calori did an amazing job with them last year.
on the 29th September, 2013 at 7:02pm
This article does not go into much depth about the reasons for Giampaolo's resignation and. AWOL . I follow Brescia extremely closely through the constant reading of their newspapers and sports sites. The ultras were not by any means the cause of what happened. Giampaolo was angry at having to meet with them yet there were absolutely no threats made. They wanted to talk with him. Period. After this he had a meeting with Corioni and Iaconi and from what was said there he left.
on the 29th September, 2013 at 6:58pm
shameful! only in italy do ultras run clubs. ultras force meeting with players and managers, and they threaten them and their family's as well. ultras say if things don't improve, then something 'bad' will happen. the italian calcio culture is sick! a coach has to run and hide and not show up to work because of the ultras despicable threats?! the governing football body in italy must step-in and do something. its crazy how the media portray this and spins it to make a story or create controversy
on the 28th September, 2013 at 12:44am
I recall an article in an old edition of a footie mag I used to have where Giampaolo(along with Allegri & Gasperini) were touted as the next big things in Italian football. Ironic how all three have floundered since then. It gives one the sense that (despite the allure) certain managers are not cut-out for the 'big job' ; but then how do you keep a man from aspiring to greatness?
on the 27th September, 2013 at 6:14pm

Post new comment

Your email address is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
If you have your own website, enter its address here.
Maximum 500 characters.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Your responses will be moderated, and sometimes edited, by Football Italia before appearing on the site. Please keep your comments clean and try to keep them relevant to the blog above. We reserve the right to reject views that we deem unsuitable for publication.